Monday, December 9, 2019

SECURING INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATONS TECHNOLOGY AND SERVICES SUPPLY CHAIN

US Chamber of Commerce letter to Commerce Secretary on extending comments for vital Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain. Yep, more to show importance of #SupplyChains.

Coalition Comment Letter on "Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain"

Friday, December 6, 2019 - 3:45pm
The Honorable Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.
Secretary
U.S. Department of Commerce
1401 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20230

Dear Secretary Ross:
          The undersigned associations welcome the opportunity to provide comments in response to the proposed rule implementing the Executive order of May 15, 2019, entitled “Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain.” We thank you for your efforts to engage with industry throughout this process.
          As stated in the notice, “The information and communications technology and services (ICTS) supply chain is critical to nearly every aspect of U.S. national security… [and]… must be secure to protect our national security, including the economic strength that is an essential element of our national security.”
          Given the importance of this objective, the complex dimensions of the proposed policy changes contained in the notice, and the technological complexities at issue, we request the Department extend the notice’s comment period to 90 days to ensure our associations and our members are able to provide the Department with a response t
hat is both meaningful and comprehensive.
          We look forward to working with you to ensure that the government receives the best input to guide this process.

Sincerely,

Association of Global Automakers
Here For America
BSA | The Software Alliance
Business Roundtable
Coalition of Services Industries
Computer & Communications Industry Association
CompTIA
CTIA
Information Technology Industry Council
Internet Association
IPC
Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association
National Association of Manufacturers
National Electrical Manufacturers Association
National Foreign Trade Council
NCTA – The Internet & Television Association
Organization for International Investment
Satellite Industry Association
Security Industry Association
SEMI
Semiconductor Industry Association
TechNet
Telecommunications Industry Association
US-China Business Council
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
United States Council for International Business
USTelecom - The Broadband Association
cc:
Cordell Hull, Acting Deputy Under Secretary, Bureau of Industry and Security
Richard Ashooh, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security
Diane Rinaldo, Acting Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, National Telecommunications and Information Administration
https://www.uschamber.com/comment/coalition-comment-letter-securing-the-information-and-communications-technology-and-services

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

STRATEGY FOR 3PLs & LOGISTICS PROVIDERS IN A TIME OF DISRUPTION


What Is Happening.  Logistics is a commodity business.  3PLs and logistics service providers are dealing with significant industry disruption.  It comes from two fronts. One disruptor is external, customer generated.  This is the e-commerce speed of order delivery that is increasing and growing across industries and markets. The focus is on the end-to-end supply chain and how to make goods move across it more quickly—supply chain velocity with its inventory velocity and order delivery/restock velocity.  


That is a change from logistics being the dominant emphasis in supply chain management.  This could redefine, for example, the 3PL niche to 3PSCM—or SCMaaS (Supply Chain Management as a Service).  


Two, another disruption comes from within the field.  Technology is adding new requirements, new ways, to what firms must do, from digitalization to blockchain.  It is also developing new competition who use technology, including platform businesses.  Also, logistics providers in a niche are expanding their reach into other niches.


There is also the dual use disruptor, shippers who are taking control of their logistics and bringing activities inhouse.  Think of it as a type of reverse outsourcing.  In turn, such dual-use actions could mean shippers taking their logistics capabilities to outside retailers and manufacturers—and taking business away from present logistics providers and 3PLs based on proven end-to-end supply chain results.


The results of the disruptions are threats to these firms, including disintermediation.  At the same time, it is opening new opportunities.  Against the perception that logistics is a commodity business, the challenge is how to adapt and to transform.


This reasons questions on what a firm should do, in what context is should be a service, and how to differentiate it.  It is about strategy.  Some say it is being agile, which often means doing something the firm was not designed to do or is within their operations capability. Agile is not a substitute for transformation and strategy.


Strategy.  First, digital is not a strategy. With technology, it is a topic of it enables and is utilized in the business.


That said, the discussion can advance.  All logistics providers—3PLs, transport, forwarders, warehouses, logistics centers, ports and other--and whether they are asset based or non-asset based--should have a strategy.  The strategy identifies challenges, issues and risks with markets and their dynamics; and, going forward, can set the direction where the company is going for new markets and new business and customers to grow sales and profits.


A strategy does not have to be long-term.  Given the rate of disruption and change, five years or less is a good time frame.


Surprisingly, despite the purpose and benefit, many service providers do not have a viable, current strategy.  Instead they view developing one as too much work, react to what customers ask or what competitors are doing, or have one that is outdated.  In a way, they letting business vagaries drive their direction and future.  Having no strategy can be a risky approach, especially if competitors, established and the potential new entrants, have a well-done strategy and especially given the reality of global economic change.  


The strategy can be operations focused or it can be a significant change, to transform the company.  Which strategy is developed can be based on and reflect risks for the business or for the service sector, competition, or changing customer and/or market segments.


There are two parts to a successful strategy—first, developing it and second, executing it.  Developing a strategy comes from serious, formal strategic planning process.  It involves a blend of financial and non-financial objectives.  The plan should also focus on the present business, and how it will adapt to the future and new services and opportunities.  It identifies where the company is going--and where it is not going-- and what it takes to succeed in that service arena.


            Planning.  The starting point is where the business is now as to present dynamics with trends, markets, services, and customers; value proposition, and competitive positioning, coupled with sales and profits.  At any stage of the planning process, at the minimum, a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) is useful for the present and potential future scenarios. 

Planning contains mistakes that can limit the ability to develop a worthwhile strategic plan.  Some of the shortcomings that can lead to a bad strategy include:


ü  Firms only go out one to three years with the plan.  While that span is easier to deal with than looking out five years or so, that is based too much on what has happened, miss-assumes what will happen, over-assumes the company’s position in that future trend and is not strategic.  It is more like a budget or extended sales plan. 

ü  As a corollary to the short-span view, companies confuse goals with strategies.  Increasing sales or reducing costs by a certain percent is a goal, not a strategy.

ü  Providers try to mimic what a competitor is doing, especially if it is new.  That is not a strategy.  A good strategy separates the business from the competition.  Emulating competitors or chasing the next new logistics service is a short-sighted approach that often lacks understanding of market niches, operational nuances and value proposition. 

ü  Companies stay with what they are familiar with, their comfort zone.  This can be a myopic bias against performing the diligent planning analysis that is necessary.

ü  It does not identify and address hard questions and challenges, such as how sustainable the present business approach and operations model are.  That negates the concepts of strategy and of planning.  

ü  Planning is not rigorous and does not adequately assess both external and internal factors.  Internal analysis does not get the rigorous attention it should get.  Diligent self-assessment is required, but it can be difficult.  Overestimating abilities and underestimating problems short-circuit any serious planning.

ü  Companies oversimplify trends, especially global ones, and their impact on future business.  They let the past dictate too much of what will happen, even against the dynamic and changing global business world.  Firms do not comprehensively deal with uncertainty and look at “what if” scenarios.  It is a dismissive approach based on the past.  Change, with its speed with competitors and markets, is more than local; it is global.

ü  Businesses create a wish list of strategies.  Aggregating a catalog of possible ideas, no matter how worthwhile, is not strategic planning.  The effort dictates potential strategic choices be culled and prioritized and that hard decisions must be made on what to do.

ü  Service providers do not scrutinize how well the strategy positions the service offering to the dynamics of global economic and business forces.  They also overestimate potential competitive advantage—and underestimate its transiency-- that the firm may create with its strategic placement.

ü  Companies keep the planning within the C level and do not extend down to others who may have a better understanding of the present activity.  There is also an underlying assumption that what a company and its executives do are transferable to the future.  This lack of communication and buy-in with the planning often continues with attempts to execute the strategy—attempts that often fail.



     Execution.  Strategy implementation is critical.  The best strategy, without good execution, will struggle to succeed.  And the more dramatic the strategy is with scope and impact, the greater is the challenge for sound execution.  An operations strategy has an internal capabilities and requirements, perhaps best-in-class.  The significant change strategy has both internal and external requirements.  Each strategy carries different proficiencies to implement and creates challenges for present executives, managers and employees to have the skills to implement the strategy.


ü  Achieving the strategy separates planning for the sake of planning and planning needed to advance into the future.  It also demonstrates the conviction that the company has in the strategy. Executing the strategy means communicating the plan within the company and with stakeholders to build support—both operating and financial--and aligning the business with its strategy.  Adequate resources and defined responsibilities for execution are needed, along with corresponding, relevant metrics to track progress. 

ü  The transformation and its rate of implementation to carry out the strategy may require recognizing and dealing with the need for change management.  In reality, there are strong similarities between change management and successfully implementing a strategy.

ü  Tied to the grand strategy are underlying strategies and implementation plans for sales, pricing, marketing, positioning, operations and technology.  Logistics providers should recognize the life cycle to their services, especially with regard to profit maximization and the commodity service view of their offerings.  This service life cycle creates the need for the subset of strategies and fulfillment of them.  How people within the company grasp and execute these opportunities can have significant effect on long-term margins.

ü  While direction can come from the top level, carrying out the execution needs clear lines of responsibilities couple with a coordinated, cross functional effort by different groups within the company.  There can be no standalone activities for success.  It should be integrated.  The potential for assuming away the need for the collaboration can create unnecessary surprises and failure to gain all the market, operations and financial benefits of the strategy.

ü  Strategy planning and execution are not easy for logistics providers.  They are a challenge.  But as difficult as they are, doing nothing in the face of dynamic competitive and market changes can be dangerous for all stakeholders.  Logistics providers that do not plan well and implement well let events drive where they are going.  They do not control it.  These providers are market followers, not market leaders.  As a result, these firms do not transition to take full advantage of opportunities.  They miss out on market share, customers and profits that companies, who have a coordinated planning and strategy execution, earn and enjoy.


Conclusion.   The times they are a changing.  There is a new reality in supply chains, and as a result, in logistics.  Call it chaos or disruption. Talk adapting or transformation. 

Customers are doing more and expect more with the new reality they are dealing with. Business as usual is vanishing.  Established practices are being replaced.

There is risk in doing nothing.  The best path forward is to develop and execute a strategy.

For more on Logistics, go to LTD Management at: www.ltdmgmt.com


Tuesday, December 3, 2019

BLOG: SMEs--TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR SUPPLY CHAIN

Whether you are a manufacturer, retailer, grocer, or distributor, you need to do this. Supply chain management has become strategic and weaponized.  The needed change is not an overnight, quick fix. It takes time and effort to do it right. The alternative of doing nothing or looking for all the short cuts does nothing for you and your business.


Some companies, regardless of their industry or size, do well. They are successful with low value merchandise or with fashionable merchandise or whatever product. Other firms struggle or so it seems. The difference, when you drill down, is often how well a firm executes supply chain management. 


Supply chain excellence does not happen by accident. Firms with outstanding supply chains have made it a part of their strategy and operations. They know that it is good business to be a leader in supply chain management (SCM). These companies understand what supply chain management can do to position and to differentiate themselves in the market and against competitors. They know that it can drive sales, profits, and market share. 


Supply chain management is a complex responsibility. There are supply chains within supply chain. Supply chains are not linear from one customer to one supplier. They involve multiple customers and multiple suppliers each of whom has a supply chain. Compound that with presence of three different supply chains -- product, information and financial.


This conundrum applies to companies regardless of size, regardless of industry, market and regardless of what country the businesses are located. It is especially difficult for Small-Medium Enterprises (SMEs). These firms battle against large companies who have leverage and resource advantages. Less-than-outstanding supply chain management only compounds the problems for these small-medium companies.


They do not look at their supply chains in their entirety nor do they view them as processes that flow across the entire firms. Instead, they look at freight, warehousing and other cost and functional areas. As a result, their supply chains control them; they do not control their supply chains. These are significant differences with supply chain and market leaders.

Such firms are also reactive. They imitate, or try to imitate, what leaders do. Because they do not understand and do not commit to supply chain management, they are not successful with replicating what others are successfully doing.


Despite the scope and complexity, supply chain management is often not vital for many SMEs. The impact to such companies of their treatment of supply chain management has handicapped its effectiveness and limited growth and profitability resulting in:

  1. Wasted capital and resources
  2. Increased costs to perform activities and transactions
  3. Lost customer sales and poor customer service
  4. Sacrificed opportunities to create competitive advantage

Companies are in a survival mode trying to deal with and get through the global economic slowdown. As firms work through the difficulties, will change come for those companies have not properly performed supply chain management? There will be change because many firms will not make it through the global recession. What other changes will occur?

Will firms try to bully their way through the economy with broad brush approaches with arbitrary inventory reductions and costs reductions? How many firms will validate Einstein's definition of insanity by doing the same things over and over and expecting different results? Will there be change from the revived economies or will companies repeat the mistakes of the past with regards to supply chain management? How will firms deal with the permanent changes that come from the global recession? 


Will they choose to have lower costs; better customer service; faster capital velocity, for inventory and, in turn, cash; and increased competitiveness, even advantage? Growth, even survival, may depend on the answer.

The answer should be to change. Not changing is to repeat the mistakes of the past and can be considered as lunacy-doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Many company business models are outdated; more will join that with the global economy that emerges from the global recession. SMEs should:

  1. Work together to combine volumes of multiple SMEs and to leverage procurement of similar commodities using technology and approach as major corporations utilize
  2. Manage supply chains and suppliers as large companies do using technology and process to drive efficiencies across the supply chain from suppliers through to customers.

  1. Determine and differentiate what the company needs from its supply chain with regards to competitive advantage, market positioning, cycle time, capital required for inventory and other applications, service, revenue, profitability and growth.
  2. Segment and assess present supply chain performance and process as to customers, markets, industries, distribution channels and products. Analyze the process based on customer and market requirements and on competition. Depending on the assessment results, supply chain redesign from the customer and market perspectives is preferable to trying to fix the present operation. Utilize different tactics for higher risk, higher complexity, high volume, fast moving, profitable products, customer and markets than for ones that are marginal. 
SMEs must break the cycle of inefficiency that limits profits, growth and return. Change is difficult, but not impossible. Opportunities will come from the new economy. They must change. Standing pat is not a viable option. The changes from the global economy will create opportunities for those prepared to take advantage of them. 

Companies that view themselves as dynamic and as global see the prospects for themselves. They have value propositions that separate them from competitors; they know that value propositions are about the customers-and not about what the firms do. They understand trends; they lead. These firms understand what supply chain management can do to not only create service advantage but to be a catalyst for new business.

Leaders know that orders--whether they are replenishment, customer, or new products-- must be delivered complete, accurate and on-time. This must be done consistently. 

Uncertainty is a sign of a struggling supply chain. Conversely, reliability is a hallmark of best-in-class supply chains. The privileged supply chain practitioner use best practices to effectively manage their supply chains. Best practices reduce time and inventory and improve competitive positioning and profitability.
Supply Chain Best Practices are--
  • Increase inventory velocity
  • Implement lean logistics / supply chain management
  • Improve supplier performance
  • Compress cycle time
  • Utilize meaningful metrics
  • Segment the supply chain
  • Employ supply chain technology
Products sold into a competitive market, fast moving products, products with short product life cycles, products with seasonality--all must utilize best supply chain practices. It is not a choice; it is a requirement. 

Time and inventory are two important, interrelated issues that drive the need for best practices. Success with these practices also creates inventory yield maximization opportunities. There is a window of opportunity to get the maximum price and the maximum yield for products. Hit that window, and companies enjoy higher pricing and profit margins. Leaders understand this in using best practices.

Increase inventory velocity. Inventory management is the Gordian Knot of supply chain management. No one knows how to untie it, and it cannot be cut. The inventory quandary applies to all inventories-finished goods, raw materials, parts and components, MRO and work-in-process. It includes new products and existing products. It covers all types of businesses-manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, retailers and others in about every industry.

There is a dichotomy of views. Sales wants 100% customer satisfaction and to make sure that there is always inventory on hand to meet each order. Finance wants to carry fewer inventories to free up capital for other needs. Given the vagaries of sales patterns, supplier lead times, and production sizes, the "answer" is dynamic. When sales are booming, inventory may not be as scrutinized as it is when sales are slow and inventory is sitting in warehouses and plants.

As a result, inventory creep can occur. Studies have shown that manufacturers and wholesalers have over 60 days of inventory and that retailers have over 90 days of inventory capital tied up. These times do not include the entire inbound inventory in the supply chain. Real supply chain inventory is likely 25% higher. This is a very significant amount of capital tied up in inventory.

Too many companies do not know how fast inventory turns and do not really manage it well. Poor turns are signs of many problems. Inventory must move quickly; turns should be high.

Inventory that sits and does not sell consumes available working capital and limits applying that capital to the business. Products must flow from suppliers or manufacturing sites to customers. Being inventory rich and cash poor is not a sound approach.

Inventory is key to profitability. Inventory velocity turns assets into profits. The faster inventory moves and turns, the greater the profitability. Inventory is the key issue to supply chain management success. Customers demand that their orders be shipped complete, accurate and on-time. That means having the right inventory at the right place at the right time.

Implement lean logistics / supply chain management. Lean complements supply chain management. Both emphasize pulling, not pushing, products through the supply chain. Both recognize the waste, or non-value, created by excess inventory and excess time.
A lean supply chain process is streamlined to reduce and eliminate waste or non-value added activities to the total supply chain flow and to the products moving within the supply chain. Waste can be measured in time, inventory and unnecessary costs. Value added activities are those that contribute to efficiently placing the final product at the customer or at the store. The supply chain and the inventory contained in the chain should flow. Any activity that stops the flow should create value. Any activity that touches inventory should create value.


The best know that lean supply chain management is more than warehouses and transport topics. It must include the total supply chain, both domestic and, especially, international. They stay focused on adding value as defined by customer, using the pull which complements SCM, keeping a customer focus, and removing the waste of inventory and time.

Improve supplier performance. Success begins with supplier performance. They must deliver quality items and do it complete, accurate and on time. Otherwise problems ripple across the supply chain, the company and its customers and impact sales, profits and capital tied up in inventories. Whether the products are finished goods or materials for factories, the need for strong supplier performance is there.
Leaders analyze spend and identify suppliers as to importance based on risk, volume, profit margin, lead-time, criticality, stringent specifications or other criteria important to their businesses and industries.



They differentiate how to work with critical suppliers from non-critical ones. This includes understanding what suppliers want and implementing supplier relationship management.

Compress cycle time. Supply chain cycle time runs from the time the need for a product--new or replenished--is determined and goes until it is delivered to the customer or to the store. The length of global supply chains adds to time and the challenge to compress. Safety stock inventories are a buffer against uncertainty. Long cycle times add to the uncertainty-and in turn the amount of inventories carried and working capital tied up.
Leaders recognize that there are many parties involved in the cycle time for both product and information flows. These parties, that are touching the product and information, are both internal and external. All the parties collectively add to the length of cycle time and to its variability. And this, in turn, adds to cost, inventory levels, service failures and lost sales. The best analyze the flows and look at where products and information stop and whether value is added with each stoppage. They understand that much delay is caused internally because of organizational requirements, gaps with the supply chain process, signoffs/approvals, purchase order requirements and changes,
and numerous other reasons. Drawing on lean, they improve the flow. In turn, the same is done with the external activities. With all the actions and parties, compression focus is placed on fast moving, high margin products.

Utilize meaningful metrics. It is easy to identify firms that do not excel at supply chain management. In good times or bad times, they cannot tell you how well their supply chain operates beyond some anecdotal stories.
There are numerous measures for companies and their supply chains. Some are micro-measures of various logistics activities and functions. Some have nominal value. And others are based o knee-jerk reactions to a problem that occurred.
Useful metrics go across the enterprise. They tie to the company strategy and show meaningful performance. Examples of good metrics are--
  • Orders delivered complete, accurate and on time
  • Time related--such as:
    • days of inventory on hand
    • supply chain cycle time
    • time (speed/length of time)-and how well (dependability or variability)-the organization and the supply chain perform is significant to satisfying customer expectations
    • purchase order to cash cycle time goes across the firm and includes supply chain time

·        Segment the supply chain. Too many firms have one supply chain approach for everything. This monolithic methodology handicaps performance, diverts resources, and creates static noise from external and internal sources that distract the supply chain organization. The best segment their supply chain and focus performance where it is most beneficial. Instead of practicing one-size-fits-all supply chain management, they tier based on profit margin or days of inventory or similar important criteria. Multiple segmenting can be done. Customers can be tiered, as can products.

The analysis identifies sectors that the company and supply chain should emphasize. It is actionable. The profit analysis to find large, profitable segments can be done by category, market, product, domestic/global region or other key targets for the business. Note, sectors do not reflect company structure as to divisions or business units. From that start, deeper drilling can be done into subsectors. Segmentation needs accounting recognition of the key customers and sectors so that proper tracking of the financial benefit is done.

Sectoring supply chains is a superior best practice. It works for all companies-regardless of size, industry or whether B2B or B2C. The benefits go beyond supply chain performance and very positively impact the firm in important ways. It has both master plan and operations importance and impact. Supply chain segmenting can be used by all companies, regardless of size, industry, market or type.

Employ supply chain technology. Supply chain execution technology is important to managing a supply chain. It should provide visibility throughout the entire supply chain. It is much more than tracking and tracing which misses the important factor. It is not about the container or pallet of product. It is about the purchase order or customer order.

The key issue is to manage the customer, purchase or build order through to delivery. Technology, especially when tied with an excellent supply chain process and collaboration, can provide that. SaaS and cloud combine to let all size firms use technology. It is no longer reserved for the large corporations. Leaders use technology for exception management and for event management so they can focus on what is important, reduce the occurrence of problems and manage the supply chain flow.

Best-in-class firms want visibility across entire supply chain process. They distinguish the inbound supply chain from the outbound supply chain in designing and implementing the strategy. They do not focus on domestic versus international to parse their supply chain; they assess inbound versus outbound. Otherwise, the time and resultant inventory benefits are blurred. Also, they develop multiple transport and stocking programs to reflect the management of inventory. Firms that have supply chain management as part of the core competency and strategic focus perform better in controlling inventory across the supply chain.

Conclusion. SMEs have the supply chains that they designed, either deliberately or through indifference, and deserve. Strong economic periods can mask the performance of supply chains. Weak conditions expose the true supply chain capabilities. As a result, they can compete effectively, or they cannot. Some firms realize their weaknesses and redesign supply chains. They choose to change, to take control of their supply chains and to grow and be profitable. Too many firms choose not to improve their supply chains. "Nothing comes from nothing" as Shakespeare said in King Lear. They limit what their companies can become. Good SMEs will change and will collaborate with other SMEs to gain leverage. They will use best practices because they want to position themselves for growth and success.

For more on Supply Chain Management, go to LTD's website at: www.ltdmgmt.com


CYBER MONDAY IS BIGGER THAN BLACK FRIDAY

Now about those retailers without robust e-commerce with Perfect Order delivery velocity. 

It's official: Cyber Monday is having its biggest sales day ever

New York(CNN Business) Black Friday was huge, but Cyber Monday will be even bigger.
Americans will spend a record amount of money this Cyber Monday following an already record-breaking Black Friday and Thanksgiving, according to three different sales reports.
Adobe Analytics projects that Monday will be the largest online shopping day in US history with $9.4 billion in sales — a 19% increase from last year.
So far, sales have surpassed $470 million and Adobe expects the final four hours of the day (10 pm ET to 2 am ET) will account for 30% of the day's revenue. Around $11 million will be spent per minute in the 11 pm ET hour Monday. 

This increase in sales can be attributed to two factors: Severe weather across the country, which is forcing people to stay home, and a shorter holiday shopping season. Adobe is also predicting a major year for shopping on mobile devices.
"Consumers are reimagining what it means to shop during the holidays, with smartphones having a breakout season as well," Taylor Schreiner, head of Adobe (ADBE) Digital Insights, said in a press release. "We expect that consumers will spend $14 billion more this holiday season via their phones."
Americans spent $7.4 billion on Black Friday and $4.2 billion on Thanksgiving. Both were increases of 20% over last year, according to Adobe.
Salesforce (CRM) also projects new records for Cyber Monday with Americans spending $8 billion, a 15% increase over last year. The sales extravaganza is also taking off on a global scale, with sales for Monday growing 12% over last year to $30 billion.
Roughly 75% of shopping done over the previous weekend was on a mobile device, which Salesforce said was "another groundbreaking period" for mobile.
Shopify (SHOP), an online sales platform that is used by more than 1 million merchants, said that Monday's global sales data has already surpassed $1.5 billion. That is more than the sales from the full weekend last year. Mobile was also a popular way for shoppers to buy, according to Shopify with 70% sales transactions on portable devices.
The shorter holiday season is sending retailers scrambling to offer deep discounts before Christmas. Jason Woosley, Adobe's vice president of commerce product and platform, previously told CNN Business that he estimates consumers will spend $29 billion online between Thursday and Monday. That five-day "Cyber Week" period should account for a 20% chunk of the $143.8 billion in online sales Adobe predicted for this holiday season.
The breakout shopping hits on Black Friday of this year were the Nintendo Switch, sports-centric video games like NBA2K and Apple (AAPL) AirPods Pro, according to Wedbush Securities analysts.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/12/02/business/cyber-monday-sales-2019/index.html