Tuesday, September 22, 2015

CONTAINER LINE PROFITABILITY

Fuel is only thing keeping container lines floating. (and maybe some creative bookkeeping?)


Only cheap bunker fuel keeping container shipping lines profitable, says Drewry

By Gavin van Marle
09.22.2015 · Posted in Loadstar posts, Sea FavoriteLoadingAdd to favorites
bunkering
Just how much money would container shipping lines be losing if it weren’t for the relentlessly steep decline in bunker prices?
A lot, according to the latest analysis from Drewry Maritime Research, which investigated the revenues and margins of 16 of the 20 largest carriers that publish their accounts.
Drewry calculates that the group, which represented 65% of global slot capacity, saw revenue of around $60bn in the first half of the year, 5% less than in the first six months of 2014. Only Taiwanese carriers Wan Hai, a specialist on niche trades such as intra-Asia, and Yang Ming managed to increase sales year-on-year.
The decline was the result of low demand combined with low freight rates.
However, it is a mark of how decisive fuel costs have become to the liner shipping industry that, despite this decline in revenue, saw operating profits in the same period actually triple: the 16 carriers posted combined operating profits of $3.3bn, compared with $1.1bn during the first six months of 2014, as margins increased from 1.7% to 5.6% in the first half of this year.
In January 2014, the average price of one tonne of IFO380 bunker fuel bought at Singapore or Rotterdam was just under $600, a year and a half later in July, it had dropped by almost two-thirds to marginally under $250 per tonne.
Drewry wrote yesterday: “The change in direction that fuel costs has taken means that carriers’ costs are falling faster than freight rates, enabling them to continue posting profits, albeit shrinking with each passing quarter.
“Drewry estimates that industry-wide unit costs fell by about 11% in the first-half 2015 versus the same period last year, whereas unit revenues were down by approximately 7%.”
It added that while few carriers provided much insight into their cost structures, CMA CGM gave a detailed breakdown of its costs in its most recent results:
Cost typeYear-on-year change Share of total cost
Stevedoring6%28%
Bunkers-33%16%
Vessel charters & slot purchases9%13%
Inland & Feeder transport8%13%
Container rentals & logistics0%9%
Port & canal fees4%8%
Employee benefits-4%8%
General & admin expenses-6%5%
Total-5%100%
Source: CMA CGM via Drewry Maritime Research
The table shows that the French Line reduced the costs over which it has direct control – wages and office expenses – but the massive influence of the 33% decline in bunker costs mitigated the fact almost every external supplier to the carrier managed to increase their revenue from CMA CGM. It further demonstrates how carriers have to gain greater control over pricing and capacity in the long-term, should fuel costs begin to ascend to previous levels; although Drewry thinks this is unlikely this year.
“Based on prevailing fuel and rates in the third quarter 2015, we expect the story will be much the same, ie diminishing profitability, meaning that the accumulation over the first nine months will be enough for carriers to walk away with okay sums for the full year, regardless of what happens in the fourth quarter.”