Monday, March 23, 2015


Global Shippers Forum wants performance data from shipping alliances

Shipper group also calls on carriers to quit discussion agreements, conferences.

   Lack of reliability and predictability of the joint operations of carriers in ocean liner shipping alliances is adversely affecting shippers’ maritime and logistics supply chains, says the Global Shippers Forum (GSF).
   Chris Welsh, the secretary general of GSF, called on alliances to “take responsibility for monitoring, measuring and benchmarking their performance on key trade routes to demonstrate enhanced alliance performance, and make that information transparent to regulators and their customers as evidence of their commitment to showing the pro-competition benefits of improved alliance services.”
   Welsh’s remarks come on the heels of a suggestion by U.S. Federal Maritime Commissioner Michael Khouri to have the FMC request the four major alliances among liner carriers to provide new information on the steps each is taking to reduce congestion at U.S. ports.
   GSF called for “a manageable but rigorous set of monitoring KPIs (key performance indicators) that can provide the required level of confidence to customers that ocean shipping alliances can deliver tangible benefits in terms of reduced costs, competitive ocean rates and improved services for shippers.”
   Speaking last week at the Transport Week Conference in Gdansk, Poland, Welsh said, “Such confidence building measures are necessary in view of the concentrated market power of the four main alliances covering the world’s main trade lanes and smaller niche and regional liner markets which are directly or indirectly impacted by the alliances.”
   "Clearly the 2M, G6, CKYHE and Ocean Three leaderships believe that mega-alliances are the answer to a sustainable future for the liner shipping industry. With that, let us agree on a workable and rigorous set of monitoring KPIs that can provide the required level of confidence to customers that alliances will not only deliver service and cost improvements but give reassurance to shippers that they can confidently invest in their maritime and logistics supply chains,” said Welsh.
   Welsh noted the confidence and trust of shippers "will be withheld so long as alliance members continue to discuss, fix or agree rates or rate guidelines in conference or discussion agreements, such as the Transpacific and Inter-Asia discussion agreements."
   He called on container carriers to "take the ultimate confidence building step of pulling out of all conference and discussion agreements to give assurance that the exchange of sensitive information, including pricing information, on a regular basis within alliances does not lead to abuses of their market power or erect barriers to market entry.”
   GSF said these alliances are a “new breed of enhanced cooperation agreements in the liner shipping sector that go well beyond traditional consortia or vessel sharing agreements. While alliance members are competing with each other for cargo and market share, they have established mechanisms for sharing strategic information on costs, future capacity investment decisions, trade lane capacity deployment, port and terminal operations, and potentially even prices and surcharges in the context of conference and discussion agreements.
   "While we recognise that the world’s main regulators and competition authorities have different regulatory approaches, there is some commonality and convergence in outcomes: namely preventing anti-competitive conduct by ensuring that unreasonable higher shipping costs are not imposed on shippers through information exchanges or manipulation of capacity," said the GSF in a press release.
   The group said it "welcomed the markers laid down by the US FMC and MOFCOM, the Chinese competition authority, with regard to the P3 agreement. Most notably, the monitoring conditions recommended by GSF and introduced by the FMC to monitor capacity and rates, and in China’s anti-monopoly laws which led them ultimately to reject the P3."
   The GSF called on regulators from Europe, the U.S. and Chnia to "share monitoring data and information to prevent potential competition abuses in the interests of shippers and consumers.”