Corn Imports Surge in U.S., Despite Record Harvests at Home
Moves in currencies, shipping fees and railroad rates mean bringing in animal feed can be cheaper than getting it from the Midwest
Even as record harvests have left the U.S. awash in corn, imports of the crucial animal feed are surging. It is happening because moves in currencies, ocean shipping fees and railroad rates have combined to produce an unexpected result: Bringing in corn from places like Brazil and Argentina can be cheaper for poultry and livestock producers in the U.S. Southeast than buying it from the Midwest.
Wade Byrd sees the phenomenon in his own backyard. Increasingly, the truckloads of grain that rumble past his Clarkton, N.C., farm to nearby hog producers are carrying corn from thousands of miles away in South America rather than U.S. operations like his.
Imports remain a very small part of the market in the U.S., the world’s largest exporter of corn. Still, the notable surge is a telling indicator of how the commodity bust and strong dollar have distorted prevailing patterns of commerce.
Farmers like Mr. Byrd say cheap overseas corn flowing into the region from nearby ports is depressing some local grain prices when farm incomes are already projected to be at their lowest level in more than a decade.
The rise in imports follows a multiyear boom in American agriculture during which Midwestern farmers ramped up production to satisfy burgeoning demand from a growing biofuels industry at home and increasingly wealthy populations in emerging markets.
The rest of the world followed suit. Brazil, the second-largest corn exporter behind the U.S., is on track this season to harvest its second-largest corn crop on record, as is Argentina. Exporters in Argentina were offering corn at a roughly 6% discount to U.S. supplies for a period earlier this year, and Brazilian corn was cheaper than its U.S. counterpart for much of last year.
A divergence in shipping costs has further amplified the appeal of overseas grain.
Weak demand coupled with a growing number of new seafaring vessels has pushed down ocean freight rates, according to grain traders. But rates for U.S. railroads, the main mode of cross-country transport for U.S. grain, have remained stubbornly high, they say.
In April, it could cost about $0.80 to $1.50 a bushel to ship corn from west to east in the U.S. by rail, while per-bushel costs to ship corn from South America to the U.S. recently have ranged from about $0.35 to $0.50.
“It’s crazy that we’re able to bring in corn from South America a lot of times cheaper than U.S. corn, but it’s only because rail rates are so ridiculously high,” said John Prestage, senior vice president at Prestage Farms, a hog and turkey producer in Clinton, N.C.
Tom Capehart, an agricultural economist at the USDA, said corn imports may slow. U.S. growers have been hoarding corn in storage bins across the Farm Belt, reluctant to market their crops at low prices, but many will soon have to increase sales to make way for this year’s harvest, which could cause imports to subside.
Global trends also can shift. Last year, abundant supplies and a tumbling real sent corn prices in Brazil 10% below U.S. corn traded in Chicago. But Brazilian corn is growing less competitive now as shrinking supplies and a rebound in that country’s currency have boosted prices for the grain.
Recently, the economics haven’t favored importing grain. U.S. corn prices fell to a nearly three-year low in March, which also helped prompt an increase in U.S. exports.
But American grain likely will struggle to remain competitive on the global market, according to analysts. Farmers in Brazil and Argentina often can produce corn more cheaply than domestic growers.
Smithfield, Va.-based Smithfield Foods Inc., which raises and sells about 16 million hogs annually, in 2002 opened an import terminal in Wilmington, N.C., that enables the company and other livestock producers to ship in foreign-grown grain. A spokeswoman said Smithfield’s grain imports “have increased over the past year, due to currency valuations and the relative cost of ocean freight and domestic rail freight.” But Smithfield prefers to buy U.S. grain ”whenever possible,” she added.
Of the growing competition to U.S. corn, Dan Basse, president of Chicago commodities firm AgResource Co., said, “It’s a structural problem, and it’s not going away anytime soon."
Write to Jesse Newman at firstname.lastname@example.org and Jacob Bunge at email@example.com